Mark,
yes, the ignored file is in a subfolder, but isn't svn up and svn ci working recursively in Subclipe?
Mit freundlichem Gruss / With kind regards
Markus KARG, Staatl. gepr. Inf.
Entwicklung / R & D
QUIPSY QUALITY GmbH
________________________________
Von: Mark Phippard [mailto:markp@softlanding.com]
Gesendet: Do 06.10.2005 15:13
An: users@subclipse.tigris.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Commit Failed
"Markus Karg" <markus.karg@quipsy.de> wrote on 10/06/2005 09:06:59 AM:
> I want to ask them why I have to do that:
>
> svn up
> svn ignore
> svn up
> svn ci
>
> (works well)
>
> while I actually want to do that:
>
> svn up
> svn ignore
> svn ci
>
> (tells me outdated transaction)
>
> The question is: If there is no other person working on that repository,
and
> those commands are run in that direct sequence (in a batch, done in less
than
> a second), why is svn ci complaining of outdated transactions? The
reasons
> told in the FAQ are not matching my situation here.
>
> That's what I want to ask them.
My guess is that the first svn up is not being done on the folder where
the prop-change is being made, so it is not updated to the HEAD revision.
When I try the same set of commands I do not have a problem. Of course
there is no "svn ignore" command, so for that step I am setting the
svn:ignore property on a folder that I previously updated.
Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 7 00:11:53 2005