[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: javahl - why would, or wouldn't I need it?

From: Steve Cohen <scohen_at_javactivity.org>
Date: 2005-02-09 02:12:32 CET

lamikr wrote:
>
>> Certainly not on the Subclipse team. We complain now and then to the
>> Subversion devs but there is little we can do. They cannot make RedHat
>> provide specific packages and frankly I suspect that JavaHL doesn't get
>> distributed because of the whole Java and open source issue. Just
>> look at
>> the hoops you have to go through to install Java itself as a Debian
>> package
>> as an example.
>>
>>
> Yes, for example Mandrake Soft is only shipping that kind of programs
> which can be build by using other tools and libraries they can freely ship
> and because they can not ship javac they can not build javahl and does
> not include it in their subversion rpm. (They are however delivering such
> kind of java apps what they can build with gcj)
>
> I am got everything working even I am using Mandrakes subversion rpm
> packages.
> I just build and installed the javahl library by myself by using sources
> I downloaded
> from the subversion homepage.
>
> Mika
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>
>
>
OK. Let me see if I am understanding you correctly. Are you saying
that you are running subversion from a binary RPM together with javaHL
that you built from source? Have you had any problems that way?
Received on Wed Feb 9 12:12:32 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.