Re: Using pure java svn library instead of javahl?
>What do you think about making subclipse use pure java svn client library
>instead of javahl?
>I'm asking because I'm developing one (library) and it is already able to do
>the basic svn operations, both on the working copies and directly on
>repository. It is also possible and not complex at all to make the library
>work with eclipse IResources objects instead of java.io.File to access file
>Library development is not finished yet, but I suppose the more users it
>will have the faster it will progress.
>I do think that making use of pure java library instead of javahl will make
>subclipse better (i.e. portable and may be faster), and probably even will
>allow to implement more interesting features, because the library I'm
>working on provides richer API then javahl bindings.
>You may take a look at the library at http://tmate.org/svn/
>I'll be glad to hear your opinions!
Yes we would be happy to use your library. Actually, subclipse uses
svnClientAdapter which supports both javahl and command line interface.
SvnClientAdapter can probably adapt to your library too.
I did not try your library yet but you we are really interested !
Received on Sat Oct 16 07:10:25 2004
This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users