I would be fine with this if I wasn't being asked to update to an RC
version of subversion. I'm using 1.0.5 at the moment and as soon as 1.1
is released I will upgrade to that. I'm usually happy to try bleeding
edge builds, but with something like source control I get a bit
risk-averse :)
Is there any reason you guys are using 1.1rc2 for developing subclipse?
Is it very different from 1.0.5?
Cheers,
Dan
McClain Looney wrote:
>On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 10:05:42 +1000, Brock Janiczak
><brockj_eclipse@ihug.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>>Hi All,
>>I have figured out what is causing the missing libdb42.dll message. We
>>are loading the dlls in the wrong order. If you try to load a dll with
>>an unresolved dependency windows will look for it on your system path
>>(so if you have subversion installed, it works). I have checked in the
>>required changes to the jhl adapter. Things would be much easier if we
>>forced people to have svn installed and on the path.
>>
>>
>
>
>as the packager, you have my vote for removing javahl-win32 fragment.
>un/fortunately, as a non-win32 person, i don't feel in a position to
>yank it out without the other win32 developers' votes.
>
>cchabanois? pkorros?
>
>
>
Received on Sun Sep 5 19:12:14 2004