It was a sub folder yes, so not the root (this time i didn't have to
delete an .svn folder because of the great new format)
We have that project in our own svn because we have a patched version
But i was currently busy upgrading it to the latest rhino (from 1.6R7 to 1.7R3)
Many changes are in there so what i did was first make a patch, do all
the manual merging and after that
i delete the contents of the /src/* folder
copied in the plain 1.7R3 source drop.
refreshed this (first crash)
source -> format (because we want to have it in our format so that i
can compare it better later on) (the second crash)
then i checked it in.
Then after that i have now a plain 1.7R3 in our svn, i copied over the
merged sources that i did before and checked this one it
(now i always have a very easy method to create a patch just compare
it with the plain 1.7R3 revision)
I know this is a bit weird work, i do this kind of work once in a few
years (and svn1.7 WC-NG makes it way better, now i don't have to do
export and so on everytime!)
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 20:46, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:47 AM, jcompagner <jcompagner_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> yes i used that team -> upgrade option a lot currently,
>> upgrading 4 workspaces with numerous projects
>> But both hard crashes didn't really go wrong when upgrading (at least
>> as far as i know..)
>> I think that all went just fine.
>> first hard crash was when refreshing a project where i on purpose
>> deleted a whole folder structure and copied a new folder structure in
>> it (from outside eclipse and then a refresh)
>> the second one was after i started eclipse again i wanted to format
>> the whole source.
> Is there a scenario/story that goes with this? Why were you doing it etc.
> The folder you deleted, I assume it did not contain the .svn folder (it was
> not the root of your working copy). The folders you copied, I assume they
> did not have any .svn folders inside them?
> In terms of recreating it, a story might help. What sort of differences
> were there in the old/new versions? Just some different source content or
> different structures where some folders/files would be missing and others
> would be new?
> Mark Phippard
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].
Received on 2011-08-15 21:48:28 CEST