Re: [Subclipse-dev] Question about the svnClientAdaptor

Hi Mark,

Mark Phippard wrote:
> On 8/6/07, Thomas Hallgren <thomas@tada.se> wrote:
>
>>> Subversion is not tainted by GPL code. SVNKit has a license that is a
>>> little like the GPL, but Subversion does not have that problem.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I would not consider it tainted either but the people dealing with IP at
>> Eclipse.org seems to have a different opinion regarding JavaHL.
>>
>
> I do not think that is true at all.

I stumbled on this thread when discussing this issue:

http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/technology-pmc/msg00512.html

Either Janet is not aware that the GPL in question is LGPL or, they
simply don't allow that either (which would be kind of funny since they
distribute swt for gtk).

- thomas

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Mon Aug 6 16:05:10 2007