[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-dev] Excessive use of TCP sockets

From: Thomas Hallgren <thomas_at_tada.se>
Date: 2007-06-14 17:32:45 CEST

I'm looking at the source for the JhlClientAdapter class. It uses a
SVNClientSynchronized. That class has a dispose() method. From what I
can see, it never gets called and there's no way for me to get to it.
Could this be the reason why I see so many sockets that are lingering in
TIME_WAIT? We do implicitly create many instances of the client adapter.

- thomas

Mark Phippard wrote:
> On 5/18/07, Thomas Hallgren <thomas@tada.se> wrote:
>> The subject refers to a Buckminster bug
>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=186092 that would like
>> your input on.
>>
>> Buckminster uses several instances of ISVNClientAdapter (one per project
>> that it resolves and eventually downloads). We use the following
>> commands used on the adapter:
>>
>> getList(SVNUrl, SVNRevision, boolean)
>> getContent(SVNUrl, SVNRevision)
>> getDirEntry(SVNUrl, SVNRevision)
>> checkout(SVNUrl, File, SVNRevision, boolean)
>>
>> This seems to result in a lot of TCP sockets lingering in a TIME_WAIT
>> until they are closed due to a timeout. Is there clean-up needed on the
>> ISVNClientAdapter to avoid this? Any other ideas?
>
> Our code lives several layers above something like that. You'd have
> to write some tests that show your problem and take it up with the
> adapter provider, JavaHL or SVNKit.
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jun 14 17:33:25 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.