Brock Janiczak <brockj@tpg.com.au> wrote on 03/03/2006 07:48:06 PM:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
> > Brock, I know you had done some work on the Console that we had to
pull
> > out because it required Eclipse 3.1. This patch also requires Eclipse
> > 3.1. It seems inevitable that we are going to need to make trunk
require
> > 3.1. Do you want to review and commit this as well as your previous
> > enhancements to Console?
> >
> Sorry, a bit late catching up on this one.
>
> I will review the patch, but I assume it will go into trunk only and
> will not be included in the 3.1 release?
I assume you mean the 1.0 release? I think it is OK to put 3.1 stuff in
trunk. We will probably have to require that for our next release.
> > I'd also like to see your work on Commit Sets either be committed or
> > discussed as to what the options are. If you can make your code work
with
> > 3.1 and 3.2 using the Internal classes it might be worth committing it
for
> > now.
> >
> The commit set stuff was actually made API for 3.2. It is certainly
> better to hold off until 3.2 is a requirement (probably 9-12 months
> from now). If i check it in now, it will break every one using 3.2.
That is good news, I guess. Last time I looked they said it was not going
to be API or 3.2.
Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Received on Sat Mar 4 02:06:49 2006