"Alexander Kitaev" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote on 11/16/2005 02:46:52 PM:
> >Peg revisions in svn log
> This is already supported in JavaSVN internal API, so I could provide
> method with additional parameter in SVNClientImpl.
We could use a version that just adds peg revision to the existing
signature that includes limit. Something like:
* Retrieve the log messages for an item
* @param path path or url to get the log message for.
* @param pegRevision peg revision if url is specified
* @param revisionStart first revision to show
* @param revisionEnd last revision to show
* @param stopOnCopy do not continue on copy operations
* @param discoverPath returns the paths of the changed items in the
* returned objects
* @param limit limit the number of log messages (if 0 or less
* @return array of LogMessages
* @since 1.2
LogMessage logMessages(String path, Revision pegRevision, Revision
Revision revisionEnd, boolean stopOnCopy,
boolean discoverPath, long limit)
Since the way you are using the API I would always want peg revision to be
HEAD, I could just add this in the JavaSVNClientAdapter without changing
our interface. So that would be good.
> >Network statistics
> Currently JavaSVN could report amount of bytes sent over network (but it
> doesn't take in account data compression or crypto overhead). There is
> way to get "total" amount for the whole operation so far, but it works
> any of supported protocol, not only for http. Current implementation
> report amount of bytes sent or received for each 1024 bytes of the data
> If you'd like I could add "extended" API methods to JavaSVN's version of
> SVNClient next week. Please let me know what is your idea of progress
> think there could be additional interface that extends Notify2 with the
> "progress" method:
> public void progress(long bytesSent, long totalBytesToSend, long
> bytesReceived, long totalBytesToReceive);
> "total" values will be always set to -1 for now, and sent/received
> could be zeroed at the beginning of each SVNClient operation.
I would suggest holding off on this for now. I am not really ready to do
anything on these yet and I would have to think about how these sorts of
changes (especially the progress change) could be conditionally worked in.
If you want to do it, then yes I was thinking implementation would be the
same as what you proposed.
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
Received on Thu Nov 17 06:58:29 2005