>Bernd Rinn <bernd@sdf.lonestar.org> wrote on 08/01/2005 09:49:20 AM:
>
>> It turned out to be pretty simple to implement that on top of >Eugene's
>> patch. I have attached the patch (to be applied to HistoryView.java).
>>
>> Just one comment regarding the patch and two general question:
>>
>> * I would suggest renaming the actions toggleTextWrapAction,
>> toggleTextAction, and toggleListAction to something more descriptive,
>e.g.
>> toggleTextWrapAction -> toggleWrapCommentsAction,
>> toggleTextAction -> toggleShowComments,
>> toggleListAction -> toggleShowAffectedPathsAction.
>
>Eugene, can you try to incorporate this stuff into your patch? I would
>still like to see this part of the patch separated from the rest.
>
>> * What's the preferred way of submitting subclipse patches: sending
>>them
>> do the dev mailing list or putting them into the issue tracker?
>>
>I like to see it go to the issue tracker because email can mess up the
>patch. Of course, you can always post something to dev@ after adding >an
>item to the issue tracker.
Sorry, I am not allowed to add a comment to issue #349, so I am sending
an email anyway.
Eugene doesn't seem to have time to prepare the HistoryView patch. Since
I would like to see that functionality in 0.9.33, I have prepared a
patch that applies cleanly against revision 1555 and that doesn't
contain the context menu for the "affected paths" table (which takes
quite long to appear). I've tested the patch and it works fine for me.
Could anyone else give it a test?
Bernd
--
Bernd Rinn
Received on Fri Aug 19 07:31:48 2005