Eugene Kuleshov <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote on 06/20/2005 12:58:52 PM:
> I removed one of the the cylinders so that the icon would be less
> and looked better. There was never anything significant about the use
> 3, it was just trying to convey plurality, which 2 does just as well.
> frame in the background is the generic Eclipse icon for a view.
> Mark, I know all of that. It is just not very intuitive for the user
> these icons for the first time. Also, when svn will be as widely used in
> Eclipse community as cvs I guess users will express more confusion then
> From other hand most of the community just doesn't care about icons as
> functionality is there. :-)
2 cylinders are not intuitive, but 3 are? It is not intutitive because it
is not the same as the CVS icon, but you are the one who is demanding we
change it? Please just stop.
> Right. But you have again ignored my question about another icon I've
I didn't like it. It was crowded, wasn't all that different from the
original icon, and didn't really add anything. The ugly "SVN" version was
probably better. I have attached alternates for the perspective and view
that are based on the Subversion logo. I think they look pretty good,
possibly better than the current ones. I haven't committed them.
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
Received on Tue Jun 21 03:21:54 2005