[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

svnAnt Version

From: Mark Phippard <MarkP_at_softlanding.com>
Date: 2005-06-18 04:30:08 CEST

I was chatting with Daniel on IRC about svnAnt and it occurred to me that
there is really no reason for svnClientAdapter and svnAnt to not be
considered 1.x releases. They are both solid and complete for what they
do.

Daniel is going to work on a 1.0 RC release for svnAnt with an aim on doing
a 1.0 when Subversion 1.2.1 is released. Subclipse will still be 0.9.xx
for now.

We were also debating what svnAnt should include. I tend to think it
should include just the Java code. We could either add instructions for
downloading the Win32 binaries from Subversion, or make our own download.
Someone using svnAnt likely already had the CLI, so why include it again.
Not to mention a good amount of svnAnt users probably are not even using
Windows.

If we do include the binaries, shouldn't they at least be in a "bin" folder
or "win32" folder?

Thoughts and comments are welcome.

Mark

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Received on Sat Jun 18 12:30:08 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.