Mark Phippard wrote:
>> I can try, but I'm not familiar with Subclipse internals, so it may
>>affect many things.
>> Exactly the same patch worked just fine for CVS. So, they do have
>>notifiaction infrastructure and CVS decorators picking up changes
>>immediately. I wonder if you are picking up code from CVS when they
>>tossing things around? Some of the bugs that fixed in CVS are still in
>>SVN (eg. drag-n-drop from SVN Repository view to the resource history).
>>Actually that is very simple to fix.
> I came into this after any of that code copying was done, so I do not
> really know the answers. If you want to do some of that research and
> backport some of those bug fixes, that would be great. Maybe you can
> actually get the Synchronize stuff to fully work. I have pretty much
> given up on it for the time being.
Hmm. It sounds like it could be easier to write it from scratch... :-)
Not sure if I'm ready yet to commit to such task, but I can at least
make d-n-d mentioned above to work and submit a patch.
> For this particular patch, I am not sure it is worth the effort, but for
> some of the other stuff you alluded to, it would be nice.
Right. This label refresh issue is seems minor compared to the effort
to fix it. In a time being it would be good to get that patch in anyway,
because most of SVN repo URL are really large and hardly fit into
Package Explorer view.
Received on Sat Jun 11 01:22:58 2005