I don't mind moving my test to svnant if it makes thing easier. I just
assumed there were no existing tests. Didn't even think they would be
by the way, i was going to send an email asking for comments on the base
test class to see if people thought it would be helpful.
CÚdric Chabanois wrote:
> Up to now, all tests concerning SvnClientAdapter (SvnTest) are in
> svnant because this way, we test svnant and SvnClientAdapter at the
> same time and because it is easier to set up the test (creating files
> etc ...).
> However, you are probably right. It is better to separate tests for
> SvnClientAdapter from tests for SvnAnt.
Received on Sat Oct 2 19:17:26 2004
This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev