[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: javahl Type Safety issue.

From: McClain Looney <mlooney_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2004-09-27 23:12:51 CEST

ach.wrong list.

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:52:05 -0500, McClain Looney <mlooney@gmail.com> wrote:
> Unless there is some compelling failure, danger or performance problem
> being caused by this not adhering to the best possible pattern, this
> should not be changed. There are numerous projects depending on this
> library, changing things for the sake of "tightness" would cause
> unnecessary pain.
>
> By the way, I seem to have missed your patch for this. did it get eaten ?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> McClain Looney
> m@loonsoft.com
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Robert Simmons <kraythe@arcor.de>
> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 03:34:38 +0200
> Subject: javahl Type Safety issue.
> To: dev@subversion.tigris.org
>
> Greetings.
>
> I noticed that there are a number of enumerations in the javahl Java
> code. For example, look at NodeKind. I wonder if these could be
> converted to typesafe enum pattern [1][2] It shouldn't be that big of
> a deal I would think and would make the interface much tighter and
> typesafe.
>
> References:
>
> [1] Bloch, Josh (2001), "Effective Java Programming Language Guide",
> Page 104, Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-31005-8
>
> [2] Simmons, Robert (2004), "Hardcore Java", Page 168-182, O'Reilly,
> ISBN 0-596-00568
>
> -- Robert Simmons Jr.
>
> -- Senior Software Architect, Consultant
>
> -- jambit GmbH
>

-- 
McClain Looney
m@loonsoft.com
Received on Tue Sep 28 07:12:51 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.