[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Copyright questions, boring.

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin_at_dberlin.org>
Date: 2007-01-11 18:44:06 CET

On 1/11/07, Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-org@farside.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:24:03PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > >* whether the form of our current copyright notices is legally correct
> > > or not (Justin claims not, in e.g. [1, 2])
> > >
> > So
> > 1. It's incorrect because it's not copyrighted by collabnet for pieces
> > not created by collabnet. WE've never assigned copyright.
> > 2. Ignoring that, you are really supposed to list the years out, like
> >
>
> I think Justin may also have been suggesting that we should drop the
> '(c)', though I'd be surprised if that made the notice invalid.

You could argue it does, because the statute says c in circle, not
(c). I'm not up on caselaw as to whether (c) is acceptable when you
can't use c in circle.

>
> Regards,
> Malcolm
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: svn-org-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: svn-org-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 11 22:44:10 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Organization mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.