[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Change to Subversion PMC rule for approving backports

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 12:35:13 -0400

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:36 AM Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_apache.org> wrote:

> To all devs:
>
> Proposal for a permanent change to our backport rules [1]:
>
> * For non-LTS releases, each backport nomination only requires one +1
> vote (instead of three).
>
> Specific diff to the text of [1]:
>
> - A change needs three +1 votes from full committers (or partial
> committers for the involved areas), and no vetoes, to go into A.B.x.
> + A change needs three +1 votes (for an LTS release line) or one +1 vote
> (for a non-LTS release line) from full committers (or partial committers
> for the involved areas), and no vetoes, to go into A.B.x.
>
> - (If a change affects the build system, however, it is considered a
> core change, and needs three +1's.)
> + (If a change affects the build system, however, it is considered a
> core change, and so for an LTS release line needs three +1's.)
>
> Agreements?
>
>
Makes sense, +1

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
Received on 2019-08-29 18:43:36 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.