On 30 September 2014 20:01, Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
> On 26 September 2014 20:34, Stefan Fuhrmann
> <stefan.fuhrmann_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
[...]
>> Not being Mike, here is my opinion anyway: I'm +1 on your proposal.
>> In fact, I had planned to call for exactly that vote at some point mid-Oct
>> (so I could complete work on the other bits e.g. svnfsfs before that).
>>
>> Due to the size of the features (plural), I think we should extend the
>> voting period to at least 2 weeks. This will give people who are new
>> to the code a chance to actually review it. I don't think there is any
>> point in rushing a decision at this stage of 1.9 "slippage".
>>
> Stefan,
>
> It seems that you started to change fsfs code actively, so I postpone
> creation of the formal vote until the code and data format (!) will
> be "stabilized" again.
>
> Please let me know when you finish.
Hi Stefan,
Could you please confirm that the log-addressing code and data format
are stable now and ready for review and vote.
--
Ivan Zhakov
Received on 2014-11-04 15:40:52 CET