Hyrum K Wright wrote on Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:11:50 -0500:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>wrote:
>
> > Hyrum K Wright wrote on Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:49:04 -0500:
> > > Instead, I propose subdirectories named ev2 in the various libsvn_foo
> > > directories which would hold Ev2 implementations. They would eventually
> > go
> >
> > Not objected to subdirs, but have you considered just naming your files
> > libsvn_repos/ev2_replay.c and so on? That doesn't need any build.conf
> > changes...
> >
>
> I thought about that, but didn't want to double the number of files in
> something like libsvn_client where there are several editor implementations.
>
> I know we already have subdirectories in at least a couple of places
> (mod_dav_svn comes to mind). Are the build.conf changes that invasive?
No, they aren't invasive; they're just one more moving part --- and I've
spent the last couple of days reducing the number of moving parts (in
various other contexts), so I quite appreciate the difference between
"0. Profit!" and "0. Foo 1. Profit!".
>
> > away if/when the Ev2 implementations replace the existing ones. We
> > haven't
> > > historically used subdirectories in this way, but I think this type of
> > > change would make implementation and maintenance easier.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > -Hyrum
> >
Received on 2012-11-27 15:22:22 CET