On 05.11.2012 15:19, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:40:41AM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>> Guess I just do not see big benefit from using the existing property.
>>> I am not vetoing the idea or anything, just do not see the big
>>> improvement and the parsing/merging sounds complicated.
>> I agree. Changing the way svn:ignore works introduces a risk
>> of regressions without much benefit.
> It probably goes without saying, but I'm with Mark and Stefan on this.
> I don't see any advantage to piggybacking new inheritable ignore
> behavior on the existing svn:ignore property.
>
> As for the property names, after much discussion on IRC
> (http://colabti.org/irclogger/irclogger_log/svn-dev?date=2012-11-01#l185)
> it appears we are in agreement on these changes:
>
> "svn:inheritable-auto-props" --> "svn:auto-props".
> "svn:inheritable-ignores" --> "svn:global-ignores"
+1 from the peanut gallery.
-- Brane
Received on 2012-11-05 15:33:03 CET