On 20.09.2012 14:44, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:27:20 +0000, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 01:35:26PM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote:
>>> and the availablility of anything that can serve git and svn
>>> clients will basically make any more svn updates unneeded.
>> To be frank, that attitude is just as short-sighted and destructive
>> to the open source community as is Lennart's crusade in Linux-land
> Oh, I didn't mean that svn1.8 would be unnecessary; I meant that a server
> working with git and svn clients would generally be a migrational tool and
> wouldn't need to follow svn. I recognise that there are use cases for svn,
> I just don't have any around here.
I expect you mean migrational in the sense of users migrating from git
to svn, right? :)
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
Received on 2012-09-20 15:08:54 CEST