On 14.09.2012 02:19, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 14.09.2012 02:15, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 12.09.2012 17:08, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> The 1.6.19 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
>>> Please get the tarballs from
>>> and add your signatures there. Thanks!
>> The Windows ZIP file does not contain a bunch of generated source files
>> from subversion/bindings/swig. Both tarballs contain those files.
> Also, the swig-py and swig-rb builds don't work out-of-tree. I expect
> this is not a regression.
In fact, these wrappers won't build at all on my 64-bit Mac OS. Some of
the dependencies I have available (from Homebrew) have 64-bit-only
libraries, but the swig-py and swig-rb builds apparently try to make
universal libs by default, failing miserably on the 32-bit link.
Not having tried to verify bindings for 1.6 releases on a Mac yet, I
have no idea whether this is a regression or not. I expect not, but
would prefer to hear other opinions before I cast my vote.
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
Received on 2012-09-14 04:33:25 CEST