On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> And really, there's no reason why the Subversion command-line client
> shouldn't do the same thing -- in fact, this is by far the easiest way
> to support multiple working copy formats, even if it is less than
> optimal as far as installed binary size is concerned (not to mention
> release management and version juggling and testing).
But why should we, as an open source project that only ships source
code, worry about this? It sounds like a job for the folks that
package binaries, either via OS package management systems or the
various other binary providers around.
If the solution you suggest is "ship several versions of the libraries
in the same binary," it just doesn't feel like something we should do
(or worry about, frankly).
Received on 2012-07-13 13:41:33 CEST