RE: Revprop packing implemented
From: Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 11:10:38 +0200
Why do you use a default of 64k for a revprop pack?
Isn't something like 1MB a more sensible default? I would guess that for the
Does such a small pack size have specific benefits?
From: Stefan Fuhrmann [mailto:stefan.fuhrmann_at_wandisco.com]
This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
It's design deviates from the existing revprop packing branch
* Have a configurable limit (default 64k) to the pack file size.
Since the new code will not be used unless you create
This is the order in which I want to commit the changes:
* refactor existing code
-- Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/downloadReceived on 2012-07-08 11:11:31 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.