Stefan Sperling wrote on Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 23:27:37 +0200:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:23:38PM +0100, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > From the peanut gallery: as long as svn1.7 errors out, but doesn't
> > corrupt any of the data or metadata, perhaps that's something we're
> > willing to live with?
> This approach might be suboptimal for GUI apps that use status to
> refresh icons etc.
I guess we didn't use a special error code for the "New value in enum"
case... (so GUIs can recognize it and treat it as ETHISSVNISTOOOLD)
Received on 2012-06-26 08:47:59 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev