[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Trunk regression? ('svn update *')

From: Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:42:28 +0200

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:stsp_at_apache.org]
> Sent: maandag 25 juni 2012 17:37
> To: C. Michael Pilato
> Cc: Bert Huijben; 'Subversion Development'
> Subject: Re: Trunk regression? ('svn update *')
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:30:42AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > On 06/25/2012 11:24 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> > >>> It also still fails when there are unversioned targets, which
pre-Berlin
> > >>> gracefully "Skip"ped. :-(
> > >>
> > >> r1353587. I think this gets us back to where we were.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if it really brings us back where we were.
> >
> > Sorry. I was referring merely to the where-we-were-ness of, "Can Mike
> > perform his daily all-projects update with seeing an error." Yeah,
kinda
> > self-centered, but what can I say?
> >
> > (I've taken taken the first glance at how --accept behavior is different
> now.)
>
> Bert, I think your concerns are valid, but can you please file them
> as issues with 1.8.0 milestone or start a new discussion thread for
> each? I know you've had more concerns than just this one and while
> I appreciate you making us aware of them it would be better if we
> kept them in separate first-class discussion threads or issues so
> they don't get lost. Thanks.

It is currently very hard for me to do this. My internet connection is over
my cell phone at this time.
(Still waiting for the ADSL hardware to be fixed)

If you like issues can you create one and then ask me to fill in the details
later?

        Bert
Received on 2012-06-25 17:43:49 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.