2012/6/12 Hyrum K Wright <hyrum.wright_at_wandisco.com>:
> We've had the "should we remove neon?" discussion before, and the
> consensus has felt to resolve in the affirmative. Now is the time for
> action.
>
> I've got a 586 kb patch which removes libsvn_ra_neon from trunk. It
> doesn't not remove the --http-library runtime option or config file
> code, but does remove the various build stuff which supports building
> neon. I obviously haven't tested this on all platforms, and I
> wouldn't be surprised if it causes some short-term breakage. My plan
> is to commit this patch Real Soon Now, pending any very vocal
> objections from folks on this list.
>
> -Hyrum
>
>
> --
>
> uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
> http://www.uberSVN.com/
Hello.
I think, it needs to be postponed as at least one server is failing
with serf: http://svn.ali.as/cpan Unfortunately it took bit long to
verify error using TortoiseSVN custom built with 1.8-trunk due to time
constraints and to verify it with svn itself.
Error itself is "Unknown tag 'txdelta' while at state 4". It was
update from rev 15448. (neon works)
Klima
Received on 2012-06-12 15:20:53 CEST