Re: [PATCH] ra_serf and APR_EAGAIN handling
From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:00:50 +0200
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Lieven Govaerts <lgo_at_mobsol.be> wrote:
> So why would we insist on treating EAGAIN as error in the response
So, what should we do when EAGAIN is returned by the socket? The code
I've never felt we got the error handling quite right in
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.