[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [DISCUSS] delete ra_neon

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 16:35:12 -0400

On 05/17/2012 04:26 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:02 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>> On 05/17/2012 11:45 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> On May 17, 2012 10:27 AM, "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato_at_collab.net
>>> <mailto:cmpilato_at_collab.net>> wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>> No, I haven't yet taken a crack at removing the HEAD request. That will
>>>> significantly help the fetch-from-pristine-cache situation, but this is a
>>>> parallel line of optimization that needs to occur.
>>>
>>> Yup. Doable; not worried about it. Along with Depth:1 PROPFINDs. I'd like to
>>> try the latter before patching. From your test, we see the checkout goes
>>> from 1915 down to 203 PROPFINDs. I can make that happen against unpatched
>>> servers.
>>
>> Yup, agreed that would make sense. Those 203 PROPFINDs would be bigger, but
>> as I think we've established, the real cost here is in the turnaround, not
>> the processing of any one request/response.
>>
> May be stupid question: why do we need these 203 PROPFINDs for each directory?

It's not 203 PROPFINDs per directory. It's one PROPFIND per directory (at
depth:1 ... gets all the props for that directory and its immediate children).

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development

Received on 2012-05-17 22:35:48 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.