[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [DISCUSS] delete ra_neon

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 12:02:39 -0400

On 05/17/2012 11:45 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On May 17, 2012 10:27 AM, "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato_at_collab.net
> <mailto:cmpilato_at_collab.net>> wrote:
>>...
>> No, I haven't yet taken a crack at removing the HEAD request. That will
>> significantly help the fetch-from-pristine-cache situation, but this is a
>> parallel line of optimization that needs to occur.
>
> Yup. Doable; not worried about it. Along with Depth:1 PROPFINDs. I'd like to
> try the latter before patching. From your test, we see the checkout goes
> from 1915 down to 203 PROPFINDs. I can make that happen against unpatched
> servers.

Yup, agreed that would make sense. Those 203 PROPFINDs would be bigger, but
as I think we've established, the real cost here is in the turnaround, not
the processing of any one request/response.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development

Received on 2012-05-17 18:03:17 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.