On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: gstein_at_apache.org [mailto:gstein_at_apache.org]
>> Sent: zondag 13 mei 2012 7:33
>> To: commits_at_subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: svn commit: r1337781 -
>> Author: gstein
>> Date: Sun May 13 05:33:01 2012
>> New Revision: 1337781
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1337781&view=rev
>> Switch get-location-segments over to v2 xml parsing.
>> * subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/getlocationsegments.c:
>> (gls_context_t): remove SUBPOOL, INSIDE_REPORT, DONE
>> (INITIAL, REPORT, SEGMENT): add enum for parse states
>> (gls_ttable): new transition table
>> (start_gls, end_gls): removed; obsolete.
>> (gls_closed): new close handler. call the receiver with the segment
>> (svn_ra_serf__get_location_segments): drop the old parsing stuff.
>> add the new v2 parsing. use run_one(). remove the detection of
>> ending within the report element.
> The serf/Win32 buildbot currently reports two test failures:
> FAIL: basic_tests.py 32: info on file not existing in HEAD
> FAIL: log_tests.py 33: log with unrelated peg and operative rev targets
> Both appear to be caused by a leaked error generated from a server report via util.c line 902 (called from svn_ra_serf__expect_empty_body()) for svn_ra_serf__get_locations() calls.
> The serf call currently returns success, while it probably should have reported this error.
Yup. It was an error that came from the server. No client-side error
occurred, so success was returned. We now look for potential server
errors on most responses. (in process on getting all of them to
> (You might have fixed an old error as I remember that there used to be some behavior difference between ra implementations here)
Fixed in 1338128. Thanks!
Received on 2012-05-14 12:07:30 CEST