Re: [Issue 4154] New - svn add foo foo complains

Daniel Shahaf wrote:

> Would having an explicit
>
>     Skipped duplicated target 'foo'
>
> notification address your concern?

It would mitigate the negative consequences.  At least the user would then know they'd made a mistake.  Still lacking any positive justification, so -0.25 :-)

- Julian

> Julian Foad wrote on Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 15:47:34 +0100:
>> In the issue, you give the example "$svn add f* *o", and then
>> claim svn should eliminate duplicate args for you.  But why
>> should it?
[...]
>> In short, -0.5.
Received on 2012-03-29 22:12:30 CEST