On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 08:00 +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 03:02:53AM +0000, SÃ©rgio Basto wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 00:51 +0000, Philip Martin wrote:
> > > SÃ©rgio Basto <sergio_at_serjux.com> writes:
> > > > why the output shouldn't be sorted by name or something else ?
> > > > or why svn don't have a sort option this is insane .
> > >
> > > It could be done but nobody has done it yet, the APR change is only a
> > > few weeks old. Sorting may need to be optional as there is a cost to
> > > sorting that not everybody would want.
> > I am a volunteer to change code to do a constant sort on svn diff and
> > status and test it , I think that is more quick that do an external
> > function to do that for me .
> Great, please see
> You should discuss the approach you want to take to fix this on the
> dev@ list before putting too much work into a patch. That way, if there
> are any concerns about the approach they can get resolved upfront,
> before a lot of work has been done. Please start a new thread on the
> dev@ list to discuss your approach.
Hi, Dev list , I want to fix random sort of svn status and svn diff, on
recent code of svn, it just put a sort somewhere, could someone point me
the directory in the source code, where is the code of svn frontend
commands like diff and status ?
SÃ©rgio M. B.
Received on 2012-03-21 08:25:51 CET