Re: Possible WC format bump

On 03/14/2012 01:58 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> $ svn mv wc/A/g wc/g # using trunk
> A wc/g
> D wc/A/f
> $ svn st wc # using trunk
> D wc/A/f
> > moved to wc/g
> A + wc/g
> > moved from wc/A/f
>
> If we now use the branch on that working copy:
>
> $ svn st wc
> D wc/A/f
> A + wc/g
>
> The moved-to/from is lost, a bit like 1.7 which simply doesn't consider
> moved-to/from

What happens in the opposite case -- that is, when you have a branch-based
working copy and you move something, then use a stable 1.7 client to access it?

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand