Re: svn commit: r1297921 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/sandbox.py

Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> writes:

> Geez. Be smart, Philip. Obviously, that quoted content is dumb. I'm talking
> about format. Specifically not following the basic rule of "one line
> summary. One blank line. Details." Julian's change is missing the blank
> lines, which many tools parse.

That's what I don't understand. Are we expecting people to use tools to
parse these docstrings? If we have to repeat default parameters in the
docstring it it something we can get wrong, if we don't repeat them they
can't be wrong. What do we gain?

-- 
uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
http://www.uberSVN.com