[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn_client_delete4 can segfault

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 23:02:39 +0000 (GMT)

Stefan Küng wrote:
> on trunk, svn_uri__is_child() has been replaced with svn_uri_skip_ancestor()
> (r1198802), but it works the same as svn_uri__is_child() from what I can see.

Just answering this bit: no, _skip_ancestor() intentionally returns "" if the child is equal to the parent, whereas _is_child() returns null in that case.

- Julian
Received on 2011-12-08 00:03:16 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.