Re: [BUG+PATCH] Repository "corruption" when committing several versions of a huge file

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:56:47 +0100

On 29.11.2011 16:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Okay. Since both svn_filesize_t and apr_off_t are signed 64bits it may
> be just a bikeshed which type to use for which struct member.

It's not a bikeshed. It's a question of semantics. What does the
variable mean?
If it were a bikeshed, you wouldn't need any typedefs at all.

-- Brane
Received on 2011-11-29 16:57:27 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Branko Čibej: "Re: [BUG+PATCH] Repository "corruption" when committing several versions of a huge file"
Previous message: Daniel Shahaf: "Re: [BUG+PATCH] Repository "corruption" when committing several versions of a huge file"
In reply to: Daniel Shahaf: "Re: [BUG+PATCH] Repository "corruption" when committing several versions of a huge file"
Next in thread: Philip Martin: "Re: [BUG+PATCH] Repository "corruption" when committing several versions of a huge file"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]