Re: ok to extend svn:externals syntax? -- was: Re: AW: [PATCH] commit --include-externals (v2)

On 11/10/2011 03:34 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> It was suggested to extend the svn:externals syntax, adding a flag that
> marks externals that should behave differently. By now this seems to me to
> be the best way out. What would that look like?

The next change we make to the externals syntax needs to be to add an
explicit "#format = 3" header to it so we can stop trying to deduce the
format the user intended!

Beyond that, I'll reserve comment about specific format changes and the
general question you are asking. :-)

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand