Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 15:40:30 +0200:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 03:30:45PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > The revision works as intended for new repositories. But for
> > repositories where the predecessor count on "/" is already wrong, the
> > error doesn't fix itself...
> >
> > If /@50's predecessor is /@20, then /@50's pred-count is 21; but /@51's
> > pred-count would be 22, not 51.
> >
> > I'm working on a different fix that doesn't have this problem: checking
> > if 50 - 21 == 51 - 22, and erroring out if that's not the case.
>
> I see. Should we reverse-merge r1186144 from 1.7.x until you have
> the fix or will it be done soon (as in, today)?
r1186231
Received on 2011-10-19 16:08:41 CEST