On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 21:20, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I thought I recalled when svnrdump was first created that there were some
> timing comparisons made with svnsync that showed it to be faster at doing a
> full dump/sync of a remote repository. When I test via HTTP:
> svnrdump dump http://server/repos | svnadmin load repos
> And compare this to an equivalent svnsync, I find that the times it takes to
> do this is essentially the same. I then compared the HTTP access logs of
> the server and see that the two commands produce identical logs, so
> obviously there are not going to be big performance differences.
> Am I missing something? I realize that svnrdump still fulfills a need, so I
> am not questioning the value of the tool. Just questioning whether my
> results make sense. As I see it, for this specific scenario, someone would
> be better off to still simply use svnsync for this purpose.
I made some performance optimizations in svnsync. Probably these
optimization also makes sense for svnrdump. Maybe this explains the
difference.
--
Ivan Zhakov
Received on 2011-08-17 19:29:23 CEST