Re: [PATCH] Issue 3942 - Provide new subcommand on svnadmin to create a lock

> To keep the information on this thread I quote a bit of information that was just added to this issue:
>
> ------- Additional comments from jmountifield_at_tigris.org Fri Jul 15 07:01:25 -0700 2011 -------
>
> Replicating the locks to the slave server, even with the right lock token value,
> still leaves us with some issues in the master/slave configuration. The
> following is based on local testing with svn, version 1.6.12 (r955767).
>
> Once a slave repository has locks present you cannot keep that slave up to date.
> This is true with both `svnsync sync` and `svnadmin load`.
>
> With svnsync the reasons are somewhat obvious. The process looks like a normal
> commit, and commits are blocked by locks. So, unless there's some way to change
> the locking behaviour for svnsync specifically, I can't see a workaround here.

This is good information ... thanks.

As long as we call post-unlock before post-commit it remains possible
for a replica to have the locks removed before svnsync tries to sync
the commit ... right?

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/