On 02.07.2011 22:40, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> stefan2_at_apache.org wrote on Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 10:20:57 -0000:
>> Author: stefan2
>> Date: Sat Jul 2 10:20:56 2011
>> New Revision: 1142191
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1142191&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Bring svn_mutex__* API more in line with its APR counterpart.
>>
>> * subversion/include/private/svn_mutex.h
>> (svn_mutex__t): make it an actual typedef instead of a wrapper struct
>> (svn_mutex__init, svn_mutex__lock, svn_mutex__unlock): switch to pointer style API
>> * subversion/libsvn_subr/svn_mutex.c
>> (uninit, svn_mutex__lock, svn_mutex__unlock): adapt implementation to API change
>> (svn_mutex__init): dito; use SVN error code instead of APR_ENOIMPL
> ...
>> +++ subversion/branches/svn_mutex/subversion/include/private/svn_mutex.h Sat Jul 2 10:20:56 2011
>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>> @@ -37,35 +38,34 @@ extern "C" {
>> /**
>> * This is a simple wrapper around @c apr_thread_mutex_t and will be a
>> * valid identifier even if APR does not support threading.
>> - *
>> - * @note In contrast to other structures, this one shall be treated as
>> - * a pointer type, i.e. be instantiated and be passed by value instead by
>> - * reference. There is simply no point in introducing yet another level
>> - * of indirection and pointers to check for validity.
>> */
>> -typedef struct svn_mutex__t
>> -{
>> #if APR_HAS_THREADS
>>
>> - /** A mutex for synchronization between threads. It may be NULL, in
>> - * which case no synchronization will take place. The latter is useful,
>> - * if implement some functionality where synchronization is optional.
>> - */
>> - apr_thread_mutex_t *mutex;
>> -
>> +/** A mutex for synchronization between threads. It may be NULL, in
>> + * which case no synchronization will take place. The latter is useful,
>> + * if implement some functionality where synchronization is optional.
>> + */
>> +typedef apr_thread_mutex_t svn_mutex__t;
>> +
>> +#else
>> +
>> +/** Dummy definition. The content will never be actually accessed.
>> + */
>> +typedef int svn_mutex__t;
> s/int/void/ ?
>
> (to cause a compile-time error if it's ever dereferenced)
>
Done in r1142810. Thanks for the review.
-- Stefan^2.
Received on 2011-07-04 23:25:39 CEST