Re: Does fsfs revprop packing no longer allow usage of traditional backup software?

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:54:15 +0100

Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> writes:

>> Or asked a different way, does a new commit update the revprop.db or
>> does it just create files like 1.6 did and things are only added
>> to the db during svnadmin pack...
>
> The latter.

"Only" is wrong, revprop editing updates the db.

-- 
Philip

Received on 2011-06-30 20:54:56 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Daniel Shahaf: "recover_body() ### What if rNNN legitimately has no revprops? was: Re: Does fsfs revprop packing no longer allow usage of traditional backup software?"
Previous message: Daniel Shahaf: "Re: Does fsfs revprop packing no longer allow usage of traditional backup software?"
In reply to: Daniel Shahaf: "Re: Does fsfs revprop packing no longer allow usage of traditional backup software?"
Next in thread: kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com: "Re: Does fsfs revprop packing no longer allow usage of traditional backup software?"
Reply: kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com: "Re: Does fsfs revprop packing no longer allow usage of traditional backup software?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]