On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 14:18, Hyrum K Wright <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:40 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>> On 06/15/2011 12:36 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> I would also request that should the serf issues be resolved during
>>> our stabilization period, that we ship with the default as serf. ie.
>>> don't toss it because it may miss the branchpoint by a couple days
>>> (trying to avoid that, tho!)
>> Sure, no sweat. It's not really until we're close to rolling RC1 that we
>> need to make the go/no-go call on Serf as the default.
> I don't envision at lot of time between the branch and the first
> release candidate for any serf stabilization to occur. I suppose we
> could roll a beta shortly after the branch, and then start the RC
> train a couple weeks after that, though.
I was assuming that we would have a beta.
I dunno what kind of review the alpha is getting. Moving it to "beta"
would get more users. Of course, we still wouldn't know what kind of
review it is getting, but I would say "more" :-)
Received on 2011-06-15 20:24:01 CEST