On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll get into some more testing and reviewing tomorrow or the day
> after (unless someone else beats me to it :-)).
I had trouble getting any reliable time differences between the
unpatched and patched versions. By putting the token counting
in a x300 loop, I got an increase in running time of ~10% for my
test file (a 40MB file - the output from all my merge.c diffs -
against a copy where I have changed the first and last line, as
you suggested)... that was with ignore eol, but not whitespace.
So here it looks like the patch barely increases running time at
all; almost all the time is spent reading the files and assigning
Received on 2011-06-01 17:57:01 CEST