Re: "... first release candidate is expected in August 2011." Really?

On May 23, 2011 10:21 PM, "Ivan Zhakov" <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:44, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>...
> >
> > I think they should stay in 1.7.0 until such point that we make a
> > decision to change the defaut and branch without them. As long as we
> > intend for Serf to remain the default, and as I understand it that is
> > the intent, we should keep these items in 1.7.0.
> >
> >
> +1, personally I prefer switch back on neon before releasing alphas.

The stated intent has been to try and get ra_serf in people's hands. That
also means putting it into the alphas.

You've opened issues to track the showstoppers. If they are fixed, then
we're good.

Cheers,
-g
Received on 2011-05-24 06:02:57 CEST