Re: "... first release candidate is expected in August 2011." Really?

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 17:03, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>> On 05/23/2011 04:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>...
>>> All non-serf blockers should be fixed before we branch. IOW, we get as
>>> close to a release candidate as possible on trunk. (and if people want
>>> to code new features, they should HIGHLY CONSIDER doing that on a
>>> branch, for later reintegration).
>>
>> Should we, then, move the Serf issues to 1.7-consider in the tracker?
>
> If you like churning issues... sure.
>
> I'd kind of like them front-and-center for 1.7.0 queries. But whatevs...

I think they should stay in 1.7.0 until such point that we make a
decision to change the defaut and branch without them. As long as we
intend for Serf to remain the default, and as I understand it that is
the intent, we should keep these items in 1.7.0.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/