This is already nominated elsewhere in the file.
(Hint: look in the 'Vetoed' section. :) )
-Hyrum
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:46 AM, <philip_at_apache.org> wrote:
> Author: philip
> Date: Fri May 20 16:46:29 2011
> New Revision: 1125459
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1125459&view=rev
> Log:
> * STATUS: propose r1036429
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS?rev=1125459&r1=1125458&r2=1125459&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS Fri May 20 16:46:29 2011
> @@ -15,6 +15,13 @@ Status of 1.6.17:
> Candidate changes:
> ==================
>
> + * r1036429
> + Fix svnsync_tests 29 for issue 3641.
> + Justification:
> + Server assert using BDB.
> + Votes:
> + +1: philip
> +
> Veto-blocked changes:
> =====================
>
>
>
>
Received on 2011-05-21 00:31:51 CEST