[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1099657 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: adm_ops.c wc_db.c wc_db.h

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 01:40:46 -0400

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 21:46, <gstein_at_apache.org> wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c Thu May  5 01:46:31 2011
>...
> @@ -3594,32 +3601,31 @@ svn_wc__db_op_set_changelist(svn_wc__db_
>...
> +  /* ### why we do filter SOME of the changelist notifications? if a row
> +     ### is inserted, then don't we want to send a notification for it?  */

This is the particular (archaeology) question that I have for you: why
would we filter this stuff?

It also kind of extends to Philip and the revert_list stuff. It does
this kind of filtering, too.

Can't we just run the notifications for every row in the table?

>...

Cheers,
-g
Received on 2011-05-05 07:41:19 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.