On 04/09/2011 07:29 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On 07.04.2011 17:19, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> "Review of performance branch": I get the sense from the list traffic that
>> we've kinda pulled what we want from this branch into trunk for now. Can
>> someone confirm?
> Someone can and I do ;) The remaining 20% of the patches
> on the performance branch are not 1.7 material.
Thanks. I've marked this item "Completed" on the Roadmap page.
>> "API performance analysis": We're doing some amount of this right now,
>> though more at the operational level than at the API level. This is where I
>> see value in hearing from our third-party API consumers/friends. We sorta
>> put Stefan King on hold for a while while we were dinking around at higher
>> levels in WC-NG. Would others agree that at this point, we're a bit more
>> free to start soliciting (and responding to) performance evaluations from
>> the likes of TortoiseSVN, AnkhSVN, subclipse, etc.?
> As a TSVN developer and user: +1 on that.
Great. Then, as a TSVN developer, we look forward to hearing your feedback
and suggestions on API performance. :-)
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2011-04-11 17:07:43 CEST